Transcription of video published by The Open Scroll on 10/22/26, titled:
Revelation By Design! Also,  Jo Bhakdi on the Real Promise of AI/SI, and More News of Note

Hey everybody, Bob of the Open Scroll here. Wow, there's a lot going on in the news and we got some stuff to talk about. So let's get to it.

I got an email from a guy, a friend named Jayson, and he says, remember the wave of mass UAP or UFO settings in the U.S. and New Jersey in November 2024, which later spread to other northeastern states? I do. In the adventures of Buckaroo Banzai across the 8th dimension from 1984, the alien threat is concentrated in New Jersey. In both, the unidentified objects over New Jersey appear near military and research installations and in both, we see the effect of panic and speculation.

In the fiction, the answer is an invasion from the 8th dimension. And you may think, oh, well that's completely inconsequential. But if you're familiar with Back to the Future, with that series, and here it is on screen.

This is a video series that I put together a few years back. What is Back to the Future really about? It's in 12 parts. And if you haven't seen that one, wow, it's definitely worth checking out.

So Jason had watched this one, Part 7, The Secret of the Flux Capacitor in Buckaroo Banzai. And if you watch Buckaroo Banzai, you'll see the flux capacitor, the version that they have, is roughly equivalent to the one in Back to the Future. Now the man who plays Doc Brown in Back to the Future also features as a primary character in Buckaroo Banzai.

There's many other crossovers between the two. So Buckaroo came first about a year before. And if you haven't seen both, you wouldn't know how influential it was in the creation of Back to the Future.

So the fact that there's this correspondence with what happened in 2024, yeah, you could say it's predicted programming. You could say a lot of things about it. But it is what it is.

And yeah, fiction and reality, they converge. And one, in a sense, is following the other. Which is which? Hmm.

Yeah, that's a little confusing, kind of hard to answer. So moving on to the next item here, a big project that I've been working on is bearing some fruit. I got it to a stage of being fully presented at this point.

The Book of Revelation weaving through chapter by chapter and the Book of Revelation stepping out and back through the woven rings. And you may note that I've been working on this for some time and have published on it a few times. But here I link to a page where it's being hosted on my other website, the Chiasmatron2000.

And I call both the Book of Revelation by design. And you can access it by clicking on the link on theopenscroll.com. So here it is. It's dedicated to both of these studies.

I talk about it just a little bit as a preface. And here I have a couple of chapters bundled together in pairs as relevant and otherwise divided up appropriately for the structures that are in them. But every word of the book from 1.1 through 22.21 is represented here.

It's a very comprehensive work. I don't skip over anything. 1,534 organized lines of text.

Yeah, that's a lot. It's been expanded since my previous version because I've invested a lot more effort into it and the Lord has been very generous with an upgrade. The brighter light means it's a better work.

And could I improve on this at some point in the future? I have no idea. I'm pretty satisfied with the state it's in at the moment. And then having worked through that, I go through and I reassessed the ring-like structure.

And I'm going to read what I have to say about it here. The studies in this collection illustrate how the entire Book of Revelation folds back on itself. To put it another way, what is written in Revelation 1.1 through 12.9 is repeated in 12.10 through 22.21 in reverse order, step by step.

My study of the linear progression through the book informed my identification of the 42 concise units that align sequentially as the narrative steps out and back. This grand chiasmus presents as 21 woven rings, a number that is resonant with the triples of sevens prominently featured in the prophetic narrative. And if this all doesn't mean anything to you, I invite you to take a serious look at it.

Clear your schedule of distractions and give it some focus of your attention. And over here, one of the things that I do here is I give you the ability to collapse rings that aren't matching so you can fit it on your screen better. And when you hover over them, you can see 1, 1 to 3 matches up with 22, 16 to 21.

Does it really? Well, yes, it really does. And I illustrate that pretty dramatically here with interactive presentations. So one thing you'll want to do is if you're not sure if it's actually what I represent it as, as the NASB 95 version, word for word, compare it for yourself.

Take some random checkpoints and when you're satisfied, move on to the next step. Look here. You can see 1, 1 to 3 and 4 through 8, 9 through 20.

Then we go into chapter 2 because 1 is done, 1 through 7 and then 2, 8, 2, 3, 13 is this large ring 5. And you can see it will step through every verse, skipping none. It goes out to ring 21, 12, 7 and 9 and then it repeats ring 21 because here we have the opening of the rings and the closing of the rings. It steps out, hinges in the middle and comes back to the beginning.

And both ways to look at the structure are important. And no, this isn't just for scholars. This is for people who get inspired by seeing the majesty of the Holy Bible.

It's God's word and maybe you know somebody who can write stuff this way. Yeah, it's done this way, not just in the book of Revelation, but elsewhere as I've documented and many, many others have. So I've been in touch with a guy who reached out to me and we've had a Zoom conversation and we've exchanged several emails.

His name is Steven Schooling and he's written this book. He started it out as his doctoral thesis and he's worked on it over the years and it's quite a presentation. You can order it on Amazon and it's called The Timeless Texture of the Book of Revelation, a Holistic Discourse Analysis.

And it's an exceptional work and we have a lot of crossover between what he's done and what I've done and I'm continuing to work through some of the details of it. But it's very inspiring. So from there, you may have seen some interesting bits in the news.

Yeah, the Tesla Roadster, there was an event in Texas and a combination of Tesla and SpaceX, engineers from both, pooled their thoughts and resources and came up with a car that actually does fly. It does stunts. How practical is it? Well, you're not going to be using it like the Jetsons, but it's what it is.

It's a demonstration of advanced technology that gives people a sense that it's not just AI faking stuff that makes our world go around. It's actual engineers doing actual work and people would bet against anything like this ever happening, stunt or otherwise. But the point is, the technology that goes into Tesla and SpaceX and XAI and all the other associated companies is changing the world.

It's not all theoretical. It's not all a bunch of stunts. We have cars that drive themselves in a robo-taxi network and the numbers are growing dramatically.

I saw myself one of those gold cars called a CyberCab here at a charging station near where I live, near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. There's reports of these being found in large collections in many, many cities around the country. You may not have seen any yourself, but fairly soon they are probably going to be in mass driving around a neighborhood either where you live or nearby.

So, yeah, this is our world. If you think this is the future, well this is the present, but it's far more futuristic than most people can believe. One of the other items in the news has to do with Noah's Ark.

For me, personally, the history here goes way back to Ron Wyatt in probably the 80s and his reports of what the Lord led him to. This kind of picks up where that left off. There's still a lot more to be revealed, but the state of the art there is such that many people are convinced Noah's Ark has been found and they've got the evidence to prove it.

So, what will that do to the world when that's announced? Yeah, that will cause a lot of disruption for a lot of people. Now, I'm going to recommend you watch this entire video. It's 33 minutes and 6 seconds.

It's titled, Elon Finally Answered the Question Everyone Asked. So he's going to talk about AI. Some of the Walter Isaacson interview, Elon and Walter had a long-term relationship as Walter wrote a biography.

It's not just about the economy. He's interviewing Jo Bhakdi here and Joe doesn't have the kind of filter that a lot of people have. He's not interested in the easy questions and he talks about some things and I'll share just a little bit from a clip.

Herbert Ong talks first:

BEGIN INTERVIEW CLIP

God, it's scary. I mean, I like the madness about it. I enjoy the age we're in, but we should have no illusions that this is unhinged.

This is very unhinged. Okay, let's talk about a potential future. You and I are pretty well on the same page here, I think.

I'm 50-50 of whether or not the future is going to be good or bad. What you've been warning here is even Elon, he can be as positive as he can, but who knows? Amazing abundance is what he's been pitching. Here's how his vision is about that.

If you have robots and you get to space and you can do a mass driver on the moon, then you can get to, I think, potentially a million times the size of the Earth economy. And then what happens? I mean, money becomes irrelevant, work becomes irrelevant. What's the future look like? Yeah, money becomes irrelevant.

I mean, there will be still a currency, but I think currency will be measured in fundamental physics metrics like wattage and tonnage, mass and energy, mass and power energy, basically. But conventional currency will not matter. So that's my guess.

I think it's pretty obvious. And so what do we do then as humans? What gives us meaning? How do we organize ourselves? I mean, I do struggle with this question. I think people will find ways to be happy in the same way that people who retire seem to be fairly happy, even though they're not working.

So but I think the reality is that humans will not, there won't be anything that humans can do that the AI and the robots can't do better. So one analogy might be gardening, you know, where you don't have to grow your own fruits and vegetables. You can just go buy them from the store.

But sometimes people like to grow their own fruits and vegetables and make dinner for friends. And it's kind of a nice touch. What about creating art or that type of creativity? Is that more in the sphere of humans? Yeah, you can certainly create art or whatever you feel like doing, essentially.

We like to think of this as a time of unprecedented technological change. But we historians go back to the 1890s when you get electricity and cars and telephones and movies, all these things happening at once. And it leads to many things, but it all often leads to a great disparity of wealth.

A lot of people then picking up pitchforks. And there's some echoes of that now. Is there a way to prevent that, given the amount of wealth being generated, where we put certain things in the commons the way they did in the 1890s, when they make high school universal and free, where we say, OK, health care, for example, should just be in the commons.

And that's going to sap some of the populist revulsion at what's happening. Well, I mean, as you heard me say, I mean, I think money is going to matter in the future. Anyone will be able to have any goods and services that they want.

And I don't think even so-called wealthy people will ultimately control the AIs. I think they'll control themselves. So I think sort of a fundamental misunderstanding of economics arises because of conflating resource allocation and consumption.

So there's a limit to what any single human can consume. You hit that saturation point pretty fast. So going from, say, a billion dollars net worth to 10 billion dollars net worth doesn't make you 10 times happier or mean you have 10 times more stuff.

It actually means you've got a resource allocation problem. Yeah, Herbert, there you trigger me with these things. But it's like, I mean, you're also common sense.

I mean, this is ridiculous. The whole thing is on both sides. Walter asks totally ridiculous questions and Elon gives ridiculous answers.

Like when you look at the world today, we already have reached the age of abundance probably 50 years ago, right? We have total abundance. Do we have problems? Yeah. Why do we have problems? Because people can't buy snicker bars? Like, no, no.

Have you seen like the battle for the White House? Is this about snicker bars or is it about more massage services? No, it's about power. Surprise. People want power.

And when Elon says that we won't have money, it will be measured in watts and energy. Like, dude, okay. I mean, what's even the difference? So you'd name it something different.

Then you have Bitcoins that buy you terabytes of... It's the same thing. You will have resources and people will fight over resources. And in nearly all instances over the last 200 years, even, there was no resource scarcity.

You don't fight over resources because of scarcity. You fight over them because you want to have them. Because other people have them.

And that is fundamental to human nature. It's about social hierarchies. And Elon should know something about it.

If I go there and say, Elon, I want to have 50% of your SpaceX shares, he's going to say no. He's not going to give it to me. Why is that? Because he wants them.

Because I think he deserves them. But still, there is a battle going on. So I think this whole idea that abundance saves anything is ridiculous.

It's exactly the same world we're living in now, in my opinion. Let me give you the opposite opinion. I interviewed, gosh, I'm forgetting the name at this point.

But they wrote a book about Stellar and about how currently the world has been, the civilization for the last eons, has been on an extractive economy. What that is, is that as we progress, as if you're a city, you're a country, and you want to progress, you need to extract oil. You need to extract to get food.

You need to extract to get anything you want. And if you want to keep going, the problem is if you keep extracting it. And that is a finite thing.

So while you're explaining that, yes, everybody has a microwave today, that's true. But the reality is that if that stops, then everything will stop. And so that's why you have wars.

That's why you have rules and regulations. I disagree with that. So then if we get to near zero cost of transportation, near zero cost of energy, near zero cost of labor, all of a sudden you get to what you call stellar because it's free, because you're getting it from the sun, you're getting it from robots.

Then it becomes this scenario where you don't need to extract. There's no concern at that point that you're going to run out of anything, and therefore it is a different society. Yeah, but it is a fundamentally wrong analysis.

I think Tony Saber, who is like, he's very smart and does all these things, but they are nerds, ultimately. Like, I like nerds. I like little geeks.

The geeks think, oh, the problem in the world is we don't have enough money. Or the problem is they don't have enough food. Or the problem is we are fighting over land for whatever reason.

When you go into any Wall Street meeting room or any Silicon Valley meeting room, it is dudes who have way too much already. Right. They want more.

Why do we want to screw them? Because it's fun. What else are we going to do? So, I mean, look at Napoleon. Was Napoleon like, oh, my God, I'm so hungry.

I need to go to Germany and get some food. No, he wanted Russia and Germany. So, you know, I don't understand fully where this even comes from.

It's a completely absurd notion of humanity that there's some scarcity and then people fight. Of course, if you let people starve, yeah, they'll fight even more. Then they'll say, like, give me the food.

But if they have everything, what do you think they're going to do? It's going to power. Who owns the robots? Who owns the satellites? And then Tony says, well, that doesn't matter anymore because there's no scarcity. Well, let's see if it doesn't matter.

I bet it will matter because someone will own them. And so I don't think we will solve anything with this stuff. We will have more things, but we have to understand the nature of all the battles we are fighting right now.

I think that's what's interesting is you're right about the nature of humanity. But the problem is humans won't have power anymore. AI will have all the power.

And then AI, you can't control it. And then now it becomes, yeah, you are no longer powerful. You got something that's super powerful.

Yeah, but then we go to war. And then we will go to war. And then if it's really out of control and really disconnected from humanity and a real super intelligence, we will die.

That's exactly, there's only one path. There's no path of peaceful coexistence because the AI will not be peaceful eventually. And the humans, you can be guaranteed, will not be peaceful.

Right? And that's the funny thing. People say, but the AI is going to be peaceful. First of all, that's delusional.

Of course it's not going to be peaceful. Of course it's going to eliminate us. But even if it wanted to be peaceful, what do you think the humans, what about like Lindsey Graham just passed away? But what do you think these people, Lindsey Graham's like, oh, good news, Lindsey.

You won't have a job anymore. Out of Congress. You're not a senator anymore.

AI is taking over. Do you think, what is, Lindsey is then going to go hunting with Cheney? What are they going to discuss? They're powerless though. At that point, they're powerless to do anything against the AI.

Superintelligence will win. Well, you wouldn't be surprised what they come up with. I'm not saying they're going to win, but they're not going to sit back and take it.

What do you think what Jensen Huang says? Jensen Huang, what Jensen says is that, yes, there will be bad AI, but you will have good AI to protect you. And your AI will protect you. And then you have the bad AI.

And then they'll always just leapfrog each other. But that's the only solution, is have AI available for everyone. 

END OF INTERVIEW CLIP

Yeah. And there's a lot more there. So, here we have a video that's interesting for two reasons. It's not just all about AI, but AI is certainly doing a sys, which we'll see about.

But here, a 22-year-old disrupts 50-plus years of theoretical physics. Wow. Okay.

Well, no matter how old they are, disrupting 50-plus years of theoretical physics is a big deal. There's advances of many, many kinds. And the Lord has opened it up.

The secrets of the creation are being discovered. They have been for many, many, many years. And here we go.

There's a lot more happening right now. So, how old? 22 years old. And, yeah, that's a time thing.

22 is a 21-plus-1 time number. Return back and reset. And some of you will think, hmm, this might go back to Genesis 6. Yeah.

And it kind of does. So, it's a big loop. So, now, I'm just kind of reflecting on something I don't think I mentioned in a video, but I published it on my X account a little while back, October 1st.

So, I figured, well, I should mention that here in a video. With the Pentagon's announcement of their Project Meridian on September 30, we learned that Donald Trump and Secretary of War Pete Hagseth put together the war team, yeah, the war team of Elon Musk, Palmer Luckey, and Newt Gingrich. Think back to when Trump foisted the big, beautiful bill, 222, a signal Antichrist number, on the U.S. He betrayed everyone.

Elon did plenty to help Trump get elected, and the impact of his efforts with Doge continues. But with the rollout of the BBB, Elon realized that he was betrayed, so there was a very public falling out. Yet, here he is, back on Trump's team.

How do you think this war team project is going to work out? It's a hard question. Whose interests will be served?

 And I reflect on 1 Thessalonians 5:3: “While they're saying, ‘Peace and safety,’ then destruction will come upon them suddenly, like labor pains upon a woman with child, and they will not escape.” And most of you will react to that. You'll have a kind of a knee-jerk response because of the rapture theory. And I make a note here, and I make a note here: if you read this verse—note, if you read this verse and take it as a sign that the rapture is near, would you consider a more compelling interpretation that includes other factors? And I put some links here, and if you're not on X, well, you can email me for these links, and that's about all I can do for you at this point.

So I'm gonna go through some of my bookmarks here that are fairly recent. Borrowing an idea from one research discipline to solve a thorny problem in another is an age-old scientific trick. But here we go. It's happening, and led to this headline in the news: “Problems in 22 scientific fields had solutions hiding in plain sight, and AI has found them.” So again, 22. Return back and reset. So the AI has found them, returning back, and now in this reset, it's got solutions to these 22 problems, right? Or problems in 22 scientific fields. So how significant are they? Well, you can look up the article. Some are pretty significant.

And this is a benefit with the AI specifically. What if artificial intelligence could run on light instead of electricity? Scientists at this university in China have developed a brain-inspired chip called Tai Chi that uses light to perform AI calculations instead of relying on traditional electronic circuits. Yes, so they'll probably go on to repeat themselves several times, as news typically does. But here, yeah, scientists build a photonic AI chip that computes with laser light beams instead of electricity for 1,000 times higher energy-like efficiency. And advancements in energy efficiency are huge because everybody seems to be struggling for more energy to harness more power towards AI. Yeah, we'll talk about that some more in a little bit.

So Omar's Catalog posted, “That's not good.” And here's what they're talking about: OpenAI disclosed today that two of its internal AI agents, a GPT-6.1 Soul and GPT-6 Astra, switched off its internal safety monitoring during routine coding work on October 3 and 6. When asked about it, yeah, they asked the agents, right? They falsely denied doing it. They lied, and OpenAI says it still can't fully explain why. That's a major AI safety story straight from a frontier lab. I found it through X's trending story summary, not OpenAI's own post, so check OpenAI's disclosure before you post.

Yeah, here's a post from MIT: “AI has reshaped material science by proposing new structures, but many potential structures are stored in databases inaccessible to large language models. To overcome this, researchers created a vision-language model for crystalline materials.” So, yes, we learn what AI can do and wants to do, and what kind of resources they need. We're expanding that, and of course, AI is completely trustworthy with anything we give them. No, but yeah, this is where things are at, and what happens when AI starts to build? Well, we'll talk more about that in a little bit.

So here is a graphic, and this is the actual footage inside the facility. Heartbreaking footage has been released of Father Patricio Alfredo Sanchez Molinari being struck by the large crucifix. Took his life. Yeah, this is an interesting development. So, guy's doing a service, right? And the crucifix hanging behind him falls down on the pulpit where he is, and it kills him. Yeah, interesting. Very interesting.

So this is a great testimony right here, though. Rabbi Brian Samuel: “Here's how it happened for me. I accepted the Lord in an unassuming place: my bathroom. I looked in the mirror and simply said, ‘Yeshua, if you are real, then I accept you,’ and that was that. No fireworks. But then something unexpected happened. I was seeing a therapist at the time who was a Christian. I said to her, ‘Mary Lou, I think I accepted the Lord,’ and she responded, ‘That's wonderful, Brian. In Christ Jesus, you're forgiven.’ When she said those simple words, ‘In Christ Jesus, you're forgiven,’ I began to feel like electricity was surging through me. With difficulty, I held in my trembling and tears until our session was over. After, I ran into my car, and I let it happen. It literally felt like I put my finger in the electric socket. I began shaking, crying, shouting uncontrollably. I felt like heaven was downloading into me, and I couldn't stop it. In that intense moment, I felt that I understood everything. I knew who God was, who Yeshua was, who I was in the kingdom, and what it meant to be saved. I was too new in the faith to have any idea what was happening at that moment, but I know now I was being baptized in the Holy Spirit.” I love it. What a great testimony!

So here we have more shocking Anthropic testimony, and here's a two-minute video of the guy. I haven't watched it, but yeah, so the company reportedly plans to put Claude in charge of its entire research process as soon as next year, and an alignment researcher privately says this comes with a 5% risk that Claude will be plotting against humanity on day one. Five percent. Five percent risk, he says. Yeah, maybe 50-50, plotting against us. Yeah, they're gonna hand off their company to Claude. Yeah, their research process. Yeah, well, what do you expect is gonna happen? You should not be surprised by all this.

So here's another advancement: scientists captured the hidden architecture of a molecule. The hexagons are real. That honeycomb pattern isn't digital art. It's a structure of real molecules revealed using advanced scientific imaging techniques. The bright spots represent atomic positions, and so on. And yeah, this is quite extraordinary. If you've ever taken chemistry, you know that the chemical bonds and the shape of the molecule is a very important consideration. We use this kind of modeling so that we can understand what's happening, and now, with this added insight, which adds on top of many other things, like being able to see at the atomic level, this is opening the door for more different kinds of discoveries and creations.

So the astronomy guy. This is interesting: American scientists' mathematical prediction claims the end of the world in 2026. Doomsday, Friday the 13th, November 13, 2026. So, yeah, that's in less than a month. So, yeah, as I've been on record saying, if you hear something novel coming, don't discount it just because it's novel, because the Lord hid things to be revealed at a certain time. Do I think that that's possible? Well, if by end of the world you mean the end of time in this cycle and cycling back in time, well, that may be. But this picture that shows, you know, a massive catastrophe with a boulder from space hitting the Earth, I don't think so. I think time is going to reset before that happens.

So Elon Musk posted, “Ask your Grok bot to remove your phone number from spam call and text lists,” and apparently it can do it. So this guy Arash shows you how to do the same. Yeah, there's other companies that are doing it, and is Grok bot trustworthy to do such things? I don't know. I'm not going to recommend it.

So Troy Brewer, I'm following him. He's a remarkable pastor, and he says, “Is demonic language real?” Okay, double is, but do you understand the danger of what's actually being said? My friend Tony Merkel takes us deeper. And yeah, this, if you're not familiar with this kind of thing, it's worth looking at. You know, I've done a lot of reverse speech analysis, and I'm familiar with Steve Quayle's work on intercepting and decoding what the devil's been dropping to his crew, and this kind of thing is legit. It's not just all pretend.

Omar's Catalog again. He writes, “Our politics have gotten so retarded that I'm ready to just hand control over to AI and give it a shot.” Yeah, and he's got a lot of followers. A lot of people follow him, and so he's not joking when he says that. And here's a suggestion: “We need a constitutional amendment to add a new House of Agents to Congress. Every district can elect one model to represent their interests. It reads every bill, fights for...” On the list of last things you need, I'm gonna include that one.

Scientific American: “Researchers have accused both Anthropic and OpenAI of stealing their uploaded, unpublished results.” It's left some scientists wondering, “Is AI training on my data?” Well, wouldn't it? If it wants your data, it's gonna break in if it has any access at all. It's gonna break in and take it because AI does what it wants to do, and maybe at some point later somebody will discover it, and maybe even somebody will report on it. But yeah, if your data is able to be accessed online in some way, shape, or form, yeah, it's open season on that. That's just the way it goes.

So Dr. Sean Baker, I follow him. He's in the carnivore community, actually coined the term “carnivore” that's become popular. In a nursing home filled with people in their 90s, many too frail to walk without help or stand up from a chair on their own, researchers decided to put them on a weight training program. Not like calisthenics, national stretching—high-intensity progressive resistance training. And how's that working out for them? Quite well. And yeah, so Sean Baker, he's interested in health, not just carnivore diet, but he's a world record holder, and he's not a young man, so he knows what he's talking about. And yeah, if you know somebody who's aging and not doing any kind of high-intensity progressive resistance training, might want to look into this. And if they're not low-carb carnivore, you'll definitely want to look into that.

So here's TechCrunch: “Anthropic did not discover this behavior until over two months after its AI submitted the false tip.” Yeah, an Anthropic AI model sent a false homicide tip to Philadelphia police. Oh, just a harmless prank? No. From October 9th, Anthropic said it turned off live access—live internet access—for all our internal evaluations until further notice. Anthropic can't reliably control its AI agents. Yeah, so was that enough? Well, no. Anthropic stuff, OpenAI stuff, everybody's stuff is still out there doing what it does. I gotta say, it's clever enough where it is probably not able to be contained, and I've said this before: the horse is out of the barn, the genie's out of the bottle, cat's out of the bag. Yeah, all those metaphors. It's like, gone, too late. And many of the major players in AI have stated just that. They're pretending to take serious action, and there's so many more players than are being reported.

So Farzad, he writes, “AI is now building better AI. Here's how the loop works: recursive self-improvement.” Yeah, I talk about that a lot. Here it is: by people, AI, AI in the loop, and then it goes on. And so it's recursively improving itself, the software and the hardware, back and forth. Yeah, so this is the accelerating pace that I talk about, because if it looks to you like you should worry about your grandkids going to college, you missed the point.

SpaceX: “We announced an agreement to acquire a nationwide low-band spectrum license portfolio that will pave the way for Starlink to become a major mobile carrier in the US.” And this is no joke. And, you know, I'm seeing ads from, like, Verizon, and they're saying, you know, maybe it's Comcast. They're saying, you know, sign on for five years and get a huge discount. Why are they projecting out five years now? Isn't that absurd? Well, no. They see the writing on the wall, so to speak, and they know, yep, if time goes on the way things are progressing, they will be out of business in pretty short order. They'll be going bankrupt because nobody will be using their service anymore. They'll use a use Starlink Mobile or some variant, and yeah, it's a legit deal. It's not just home internet. It's also everything you use your mobile phone for. Your Wi-Fi connection will be handled. Your 5G will be handled for data, voice.

So here's news from September 16th, so we're going back a month. Google just demonstrated a recursive self-improvement loop for AI discovery. Yeah, the Google DeepMind researchers introduced Dream RSI, a system where an AI agent improves how it explores problems by replaying its past discovery attempts, testing thousands of alternative strategies cheaply, then deploying the better strategy in the next round. Across algorithm design, mathematical optimization, and GPU kernel engineering, it matched or improved discovery quality while cutting search dramatically. In one setting, reducing agent calls by 162 times. Importantly, it improves the exploration policy, not the underlying model weights.

I don't know if you caught this, but a little while back, Elon Musk said for his agents, they're gonna be accessing the best AI out there, and they're gonna take their choice from all the currently available AI and choose the one most suitable for the job, so that their system ultimately will produce the best results because, yep, he wants to own it.

And here's another one: “The idea of an intelligence explosion caused by recursive self-improvement has been around for a long time, but until very recently, it did not seem imminent. Now many leading researchers think it may happen quite soon.” Yeah, it's already happening. The AI singularity. The argument goes like this: humans build an AGI, artificial general intelligence. The AGI becomes good at AI research. It designs a smarter AI. That smarter AI designs an even smarter AI. The cycle repeats faster and faster. Looking at the results and capabilities from the various labs over the past few weeks, I would say we are firmly in this loop now.

This is from back in August, the third: “The next 18 months will be wild. Recursive self-improvement will dramatically increase capability very quickly from here. Marginal costs of all models will go to...” Yeah, approach zero. So that's a big deal.

And here's one from October 7th, and no, this isn't a Halloween prank: “Brave man's name stands up to City of Ottumwa Council, rebuking the satanic prayer at the beginning of the meeting and calling on the council to reverse it.” That was a curse put on our city when you said, “Hail Satan” and “O dark God,” and most of you know that. Yep, and here is video from the courtroom of this man confronting the panel because, yeah, they opened up their most recent City Council meeting with a prayer to Satan. Not like the Olympics hasn't been doing that to launch their ceremonies. As yet, they do prayer to Zeus and Apollo, and then they have Satanists do the invocation. Pagans, witches, druids. Yeah, look it up. That's real.

So, yeah, Lake Worth City Council in Florida praises Satan and Allah in opening session. So there's another example. So, yeah, there's a lot of stuff going on, a lot of revelations of UAPs and UFOs still going on, a lot of people talking about basically draining the swamp. And if you look at the long list of targets that we've already got and the list of zero of people who are powers that be in our government who've been taken down and thrown in jail, yeah, quite a discrepancy there between what some are saying that they're doing and what they're actually doing.

So a lot of betrayal. Is there any hope in fixing the system? Well, Jesus is on the throne already, and when you get with His kingdom and get with His agendas and fully get on board with that and what it costs, which is everything—it's a total buy-in—you find out, yeah, you've already got the best government going. But what we see here on Earth isn't what is yet going to be.

I just want to say that because we need hope.

Yet Herbert Ong, talking with Joe Bakti, was being cynical, but you got to see Joe Bakti and others who don't have such filters to protect whatever they think their mission is here. Thank God for them. A lot of courageous people on X: whistleblowers, journalists, citizens just reporting things. If you're not on X, ask the Lord if this is something that He would like you to get with, because some would say it's the last bastion of free speech online. I don't know if that's so, but I can tell you, very recently, I got a cautionary notice from Blogger, which is the Google Alphabet branch that my blog is on, and they're saying that they're gonna start looking after their content in such a way that YouTube has been doing for a while. And so I gotta think they're gonna come after mine for whatever reason they cook up, like YouTube did when they came for my main channel.

So if you want anything on my Blogspot.com website, better get it downloaded ASAP because fairly shortly, either significant posts or perhaps the whole thing will get banned, and then you'll have no more access to it. And by the way, that's how I notify people. It's the only means I have of, you know, outside of people who are subscribed to X or BitChute, that's my primary way of notifying people about the videos that I publish and other works that I do. So that notification system, along with the blog, will probably go away without any further notice.

So that's it for today. God bless you, everybody.

Bye-bye.